There is no protection from copying designs in the fashion industry, so how are police able to crackdown on knock-offs?

Copyright originally only applied to printed works, and though it has been extended to sound recordings, movies, and software, its protections have never yet covered fashion design. Copyright in the American tradition provides an incentive to encourage the creation of new works, with the goal of benefitting everyone by increasing the amount of creative works. Despite this lack of statutory incentive, the fashion industry has never lacked for creativity–but nonetheless, some still think fashion needs protection in order to be innovative:

On Aug. 5, Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) introduced S.3728: The Innovative Design Protection and Piracy Prevention Act. He’s got 10 co-sponsors — including three Republicans — and a big idea: to extend copyright protections to the fashion industry, where none currently exist. That’s right: none. I — well, not I, but someone who can sew — can copy Vera Wang’s (extremely expensive) dress and sell it to you right now (for much less), and Wang can’t do a thing about it.

via In copycats vs. copyright, the knock-off wins from the Washington Post.

So if Sen. Schumer has to introduce a law to protect the fashion industry from fakes, how come knock-offs are already seized by police? The answer is that even though copyright doesn’t protect fashion, trademark does. Copyright gives a medium-term monopoly to creators, while provides much more limited protection–but lasts as long as the brand protects and uses its mark.

In short, it’s perfectly OK to copy a high-end purse, as long as you don’t copy the logo and brand of the designer. Copy all you want, but don’t pretend your copy is the real thing. The point of this–as with trademark generally–is to avoid confusing or misleading customers. From the business side, the point is to keep poor imitations from cheapening the investment in the brand.

Of course, it’s not always clear what’s merely a copy vs. what’s actually counterfeit, but that’s why we have lawyers!

Measuring the impact of technology on the law

It’s difficult to come up with more quantitative measurements to look at how technology has impacted law. One could look at the development of new technologies (via patent applications, perhaps?) and then look to see how soon afterwards the invention began to show up in legal cases. Another interesting idea would be to see if changes in technology–the development of new citation systems, more rapid dissemination of decisions and publications, and later the creation of electronic repositories such as Lexis and Westlaw–had any impact on the way lawyers and judges developed law.

Juries and scientific expertise

In the American system (and, perhaps to a lesser extent, in all countries following the Anglo-American legal approach), science and scientific evidence emerges and is interpreted through the actions of the parties involved. Expert witnesses testify for a particular side, and are employed by a particular side.

The bar approaches: BarMax vs. MicroMash

The California Bar Exam begins next Tuesday. After a month+ of studying, I feel sort of ready. Unlike some recent law grads, I had a life pulling at me during my bar study time, so I simply wasn’t able to sign up to a service like Barbri that required hours of in-class lectures (often in front of a video screen, too, which certainly wasn’t appealing). So instead I turned to alternative approaches. The two I settled on were MicroMash (initially) and BarMax (finally).

Implications of the AP licensing scheme

So, the AP has in the past made a big deal about holding on to the rights to every tiny little bit of what they right (essentially denying that fair use even exists). Who better than those snarky peeps at Woot to call them on the implications of such a scheme?

The marketplace of ideas

Intellectual property, despite the name, doesn’t quite work like regular property. A look at intellectual property markets highlight problems with a pure free-market approach that aren’t necessarily visible with other markets.

The new world of self-publishing: it's not just for vanity anymore!

It’s finally possible–although still hardly likely–to skip the traditional publishers altogether, publishing yourself (via Amazon, for example), and get discovered by fans directly.

Why not an open-access Law.gov to access public legal materials?

Carl Malamud’s vision of a new Law.gov “would give public easier access to all kinds of documents” — and not force us to rely on LexisNexis and Westlaw for access to what is, after all, public material.

Looking forward to reading the new Adrian Johns book

So illustrious a source as the Fred von Lohmann at the Electronic Frontier Foundation recommends the new book by Adrian Johns.

Was medieval Islamic culture inhospitable to science?

Myth #4 in Galileo Goes to Jail and Other Myths about Science and Religion is Syed Nomanul Haq’s article entitled “That Medieval Islamic Culture was Inhospitable to Science.”

Modern Islam and science: an article by Seyyed Hossein Nasr

In “Islam and Science,” an article written for the Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science, Nasr attempts to give a broad overview of the relationship of Islam to modern science and technology. He makes some key points regarding to criticism of Western science from an Islamic point a view.

Disclaimer & Privacy

This is not legal advice. I am not your attorney. I am not licensed to practice in your jurisdiction. I am not soliciting your business. Please see our Privacy Policy.

Copyright

© 2005-2010 by Kristopher Nelson. Want to republish? Get permission. Want to quote? That's fair use.

Home Page Sponsors

san diego bankruptcy court
West Palm Beach injury lawyer - we work for our clients by listening to what they say so that we can understand their needs and give them the best representation possible.
dallas tx divorce lawyer
New York Lawyer
Phoenix criminal defense attorney
expungement nj

Site Sponsors

© 2005-2010 by Kristopher Nelson. Want to republish? Get permission. Want to quote? That's fair use. Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha