Challenging the big two in legal research

There have been several new entrants to the legal research marketplace, including the now-established Fastcase, along with free alternatives like AltLaw and FindLaw. Google recently entered the picture by adding legal cases (federal and state) to Google Scholar, and now Bloomberg (known for business-focused research tools) is experimenting with a new legal research product.

Does selling access to court-filed attorney briefs violate copyright law?

California courts are turning over attorney work product to for-fee services like LexisNexis and Westlaw, which then resell them (or merely make them available?) to customers. Does this violate copyright law?

When is print better than online?

Cost is a major element of this: online access to a treatise (a compendium of legal research, opinion, etc. that’s an extremely useful resource for understanding an area of the law before diving into more specifics) can run to around $825 an hour, while the print version of the same treatise costs $499 per year (or less, if you don’t mind out-of-date treatises). But it’s more than simply the straight-up cost of access – print research can be more effective and time-efficient for many tasks.

Texas effectively denies open access to state law

A recent change to the Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure gives “memorandum” opinions full precedential value – but those opinions are currently only accessible through the very expensive Westlaw or LexisNexis.

Disclaimer & Privacy

This is not legal advice. I am not your attorney. I am not licensed to practice in your jurisdiction. I am not soliciting your business. Please see our Privacy Policy.

Copyright

© 2005-2010 by Kristopher Nelson. Want to republish? Get permission. Want to quote? That's fair use.

Site Sponsors

© 2005-2010 by Kristopher Nelson. Want to republish? Get permission. Want to quote? That's fair use. Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha