So, the AP has in the past made a big deal about holding on to the rights to every tiny little bit of what they right (essentially denying that fair use even exists). Who better than those snarky peeps at Woot to call them on the implications of such a scheme?
California courts are turning over attorney work product to for-fee services like LexisNexis and Westlaw, which then resell them (or merely make them available?) to customers. Does this violate copyright law?
Should someone — either you or your carrier — have to pay additionally for a “public performance” of a song when your phone rings?
Brett Trout has a useful introduction to “fair use” up on BlawgIT. The goal is to help you “spot the issues” and avoid some common urban legends. Recommended.
Latoicha Givens writes:
In the case of RIAA vs. Joel Tenenbaum, the court is currently accepting an argument that peer to peer file sharing is a Fair Use exception to Copyright Infringement Laws. Essentially, the argument is that file sharing is not commercial use and therefore not copyright infringement. In lay terms, this means that as [...]
This blog represents my views, my opinions, and my thoughts at a moment in time. It's focus is on law and technology, along with history, education, science, and anything else that strikes my fancy.| © 2005-2010 by Kristopher Nelson. Want to republish? Get permission. Want to quote? That's fair use. | Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha |
Follow me on Twitter