On 6 December 2002, Josh Marshall's talkingpoi...Image via Wikipedia

Should so-called “shield laws,” intended to provide protection for journalists from being forced to reveal their confidential sources, apply to bloggers? The current answer seems to be “no,” although the question must be asked on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis.

In the United States, there is no federal shield law, for journalists or bloggers. There are, however, many shield laws at the state level. (For more on this, see A Guide to Journalist Shield Laws from Poynter Online, an excellent compendium of such laws.) Some states have already recognized the important of blogging to modern journalism: New York is currently debating whether to pass a bill to explicitly extend protection to bloggers.

In Australia, such laws are currently being debated for adoption at the federal level, according to Peter Timmons, a consultant working on freedom of information and privacy protection issues. It’s unclear to me whether the proposed Australian law would cover bloggers, however.

Cearta.ie, an Irish legal blog, has several good articles discussing “journalists’ source privilege” from an international perspective. I recommend you read through it to get a better idea of the global status of the issues, especially in Europe.

From a “free press” perspective, the privilege is incredibly valuable. On other hand, like any evidentiary privilege rule (spousal testimony, for example) it can be very frustrating for law enforcement in certain situations. Overall, I think it would be a net good, if written sensibly, and it would also be a net good to extend the privilege to bloggers who act like journalists – but again, with some specific language defining what that means.

Share this post

Share to Facebook Share to Twitter
Stumble It Share to Delicious
Share to Google More...

Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS Subscribe via RSS

2 Responses to “Journalist Shield Laws and Bloggers”

  1. A journalism student who witnessed a murder (and took some photos) in San Francisco is now trying to use California’s journalist shield law to refuse to cooperate with police
     
    As a witness to the crime, should he have to reveal what he saw? In a sense, he is a witness first and a journalist second – this seems different from revealing what a confidential source said after all… 

  2. Kristopher Nelson says:

    The source for the above comment was the ever-interesting Techdirt: Student Who Witnessed Murder Trying to Use Journalism Shield Law. More details there for those interested.

Leave a Reply

(required)

(required)

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Disclaimer & Privacy

This is not legal advice. I am not your attorney. I am not licensed to practice in your jurisdiction. I am not soliciting your business. Please see our Privacy Policy.

Copyright

© 2005-2010 by Kristopher Nelson. Want to republish? Get permission. Want to quote? That's fair use.

Site Sponsors

© 2005-2010 by Kristopher Nelson. Want to republish? Get permission. Want to quote? That's fair use. Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha