What Copyright Law and Plane Crashes Have in Common

Concurring Opinions — What Copyright Law and Plane Crashes Have in Common:

As oth­ers have already noted, the Atlantic Monthly is now mak­ing its arti­cles avail­able online, includ­ing browseable issues going ten years back and select arti­cles through most of the twen­ti­eth cen­tury. I imme­di­ately checked it out to see if one of my favorite Atlantic arti­cles was up, and it is: William Langewiesche’s The Lessons of ValuJet 592. Langewiesche’s arti­cle is a cap­ti­vat­ing look at a clas­sic “sys­tem acci­dent,” the 1996 crash of a ValuJet (now AirTran) plane due to the improper load­ing of unspent oxy­gen gen­er­a­tors in the hold. I highly rec­om­mend it.

This is a very inter­est­ing dis­cus­sion of “sys­tem acci­dents,” and how the prob­lems of design in air­planes and every­day phys­i­cal objects (like doors with “pull” bars that in fact are sup­posed to be pushed), are anal­o­gous to prob­lems in copy­right law:

How does all of this relate to copy­right? Copyright law is badly designed to relate to humans. It’s par­tic­u­larly mal­adapted to apply to the humans that, more and more, need to know what the rules of copy­right are: non-​​lawyer indi­vid­ual consumers.

Related articles